<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DNS Fool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnsfool.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnsfool.com</link>
	<description>News about the Domain Name System</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on DNS SRV Record Tutorial by thiago</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/2008/06/05/dns-srv-record-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>thiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?p=9#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I would like to learn about dns srv, I am doing some tests in laboratory.

Tanks


Thiago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to learn about dns srv, I am doing some tests in laboratory.</p>
<p>Tanks</p>
<p>Thiago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Government Mandates DNSSEC by wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/2008/08/27/us-government-mandates-dnssec/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>wannabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?p=44#comment-17</guid>
		<description>this is just one of those things thats mandated but never actually gets implemented. 

I work for a budget hosting company and there are tons of .gov domains out there, managed by people who can barley use email. So good luck trying to get that sort of person up to speed on this dns stuff when they were barley able to get front page to publish to our servers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is just one of those things thats mandated but never actually gets implemented. </p>
<p>I work for a budget hosting company and there are tons of .gov domains out there, managed by people who can barley use email. So good luck trying to get that sort of person up to speed on this dns stuff when they were barley able to get front page to publish to our servers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Government Mandates DNSSEC by web design company</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/2008/08/27/us-government-mandates-dnssec/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>web design company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?p=44#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Homeland inSecurity manage root keys? FUCK NO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Homeland inSecurity manage root keys? FUCK NO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patch for daemontools on Ubuntu by Alain EMPAIN</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/tips/patch-for-daemontools-on-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain EMPAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?page_id=18#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hello Cory,

indeed I enjoyed your paper and now everything is in order (on a test server, not yet replacing the actual one because a valid DNS is soooo important for our work ;-) )

Our DNS is authoritary for the main domain br.fgov.be (two C classes),
but also for some other small domains like vbta.ba, botanicgarden.be jardinbotanique.be botanischetuinen.be (we use four languages in Belgium : FR, NL, EN, DE).

So it is not complex, but not trivial either.

And without consulting any documentation but your paper, I was able to set tinydns up within a half hour (after compilation and install) : mainly the time reqired to type the stuff and to check it.

This is clearly a nice achievement for tinydns and your work ! Thank you very much.
 
You were right, my copy of your patch was not correct; I began from scratch again, and everything went fine, except a small right problem for daemontools at package/run.eventd

Here is my summary, from a basic Ubuntu 8.04 net install 'cli' (+- 650 MB)
------------------------
   apt-get install  gcc make patch libc6-dev
   wget http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz

unpack and go to the base directory of daemontools

   cd [daemontools-dir]
   echo gcc -O2 -include /usr/include/errno.h &#62; compile/conf-cc
   patch -p1 &#60; /tmp/daemontools-eventd.patch

   # ------ added by me :
   chmod 744 package/run.eventd

   package/install
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Cory,</p>
<p>indeed I enjoyed your paper and now everything is in order (on a test server, not yet replacing the actual one because a valid DNS is soooo important for our work <img src='http://www.dnsfool.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Our DNS is authoritary for the main domain br.fgov.be (two C classes),<br />
but also for some other small domains like vbta.ba, botanicgarden.be jardinbotanique.be botanischetuinen.be (we use four languages in Belgium : FR, NL, EN, DE).</p>
<p>So it is not complex, but not trivial either.</p>
<p>And without consulting any documentation but your paper, I was able to set tinydns up within a half hour (after compilation and install) : mainly the time reqired to type the stuff and to check it.</p>
<p>This is clearly a nice achievement for tinydns and your work ! Thank you very much.</p>
<p>You were right, my copy of your patch was not correct; I began from scratch again, and everything went fine, except a small right problem for daemontools at package/run.eventd</p>
<p>Here is my summary, from a basic Ubuntu 8.04 net install &#8216;cli&#8217; (+- 650 MB)<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
   apt-get install  gcc make patch libc6-dev<br />
   wget <a href="http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz" rel="nofollow">http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/daemontools-0.76.tar.gz</a></p>
<p>unpack and go to the base directory of daemontools</p>
<p>   cd [daemontools-dir]<br />
   echo gcc -O2 -include /usr/include/errno.h &gt; compile/conf-cc<br />
   patch -p1 &lt; /tmp/daemontools-eventd.patch</p>
<p>   # &#8212;&#8212; added by me :<br />
   chmod 744 package/run.eventd</p>
<p>   package/install<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Patch for daemontools on Ubuntu by Alain EMPAIN</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/tips/patch-for-daemontools-on-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain EMPAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 08:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?page_id=18#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hello Cory,
I found your article (LJ) so interessing that I planned to move our institution DNS to djbdns.

I use Ubuntu (8.04), and I tried to apply you patch :

patch -p1 &#60; patch-for-ubuntu
--------------------------------------------
patching file package/boot.eventd
patching file package/run
patch: **** malformed patch at line 39:   +elif test -r /etc/inittab

Maybe it is a problem for me, but I think it is better to solve it at the source.

Have a nice day,

Alain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Cory,<br />
I found your article (LJ) so interessing that I planned to move our institution DNS to djbdns.</p>
<p>I use Ubuntu (8.04), and I tried to apply you patch :</p>
<p>patch -p1 &lt; patch-for-ubuntu<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
patching file package/boot.eventd<br />
patching file package/run<br />
patch: **** malformed patch at line 39:   +elif test -r /etc/inittab</p>
<p>Maybe it is a problem for me, but I think it is better to solve it at the source.</p>
<p>Have a nice day,</p>
<p>Alain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expanding the DNS Universe by Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.dnsfool.com/2008/06/24/expanding-the-dns-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnsfool.com/?p=22#comment-2</guid>
		<description>As a marketing professional this would be provide large corporations with an opportunity to carve out additional real estate for thier existing business. It will create more revenue for registries and registrars and I cannot forsee any business  giving up their .com position. For newer businesses it would give the opportunity to get the name they want and differentiate themselves from their competitors by having a personalized TLD.  As for your comment about making it tricky for newcomers to navigate, I see what you mean. Being able to go directly to the browser and type in a name and .com would return more choices in the search, but I am sure there are existing business, or start-ups awaiting the news and standing by to develop additional DNS capabilities and search engine capability to make the experience easy to navigate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a marketing professional this would be provide large corporations with an opportunity to carve out additional real estate for thier existing business. It will create more revenue for registries and registrars and I cannot forsee any business  giving up their .com position. For newer businesses it would give the opportunity to get the name they want and differentiate themselves from their competitors by having a personalized TLD.  As for your comment about making it tricky for newcomers to navigate, I see what you mean. Being able to go directly to the browser and type in a name and .com would return more choices in the search, but I am sure there are existing business, or start-ups awaiting the news and standing by to develop additional DNS capabilities and search engine capability to make the experience easy to navigate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
